If a cobalt-chromium alloy is placed in the same dental implant situation – same host, same placement technique, same load – no osseointegration will occur. present potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury. High-density high-purity (> 99.5%) alumina was the first ceramic to find wide clinical use. Some of these materials have caused immediate or delayed adverse reactions because of their allergenic or toxic potentials. Despite markedly elevated blood, plasma, and urine levels of mercury, no renal impairment was noted. This shrinkage may also occur with enamel. Testing of dental materials also includes tests for pulp irritation responses, pulp capping effects, endodontic applications, and dental implant performance. Two key-words “dental amalgam” and “toxicity” were used to search publications on dental amalgam biocompatibility published in peer-reviewed journals written in English. Any biomaterial that is placed adjacent to a natural tissue in the body can induce local or systemic biological effects. Some studies indicate that leaching of bisphenol A decreases over a relatively short period, and the results suggest that the toxicity risk is extremely low. Those that have favorable test results are then subjected to secondary tests. Despite markedly elevated blood, plasma, and urine levels of mercury, no renal impairment was noted. The arrows in this figure indicate the pathways that foreign substances from a restorative material, if present, take into the oral environment, the tissue space next to the periodontium (PD), the pulp chamber (P), or the periapical region (PA). The concern about estrogens in dentistry centers around a chemical called bisphenol A (BPA), which is a synthetic starting point for bis-GMA (bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate) composites in dentistry as well as many other plastics. Class III: High risk—General Controls & Premarket Approval (PMA) Application (PMA required; must demonstrate safety and effectiveness without relying on a predicate device). Instead, we must rely on the signs and symptoms expressed by our patients and the visual signs observed during clinical exams. According to Merriam-Webster, the definition of biocompatibility is: compatibility with living tissue or a living system by not being toxic, injurious, or physiologically reactive and not causing immunological rejection. Thus, the integrity of the resin–collagen interface will control the potential pulp-damaging effect of these restorations. Biocompatibility in Dentistry Not all fillings are made the same. Without the light interaction there is no color. The interactions between material, host, and function continue over time; therefore, the biological response to a material is a dynamic, ongoing process. Although it is unlikely that the practicing orthodontist will need to evaluate results of these tests directly, it is important that he or she understands how materials are approved for use, since ultimately it is the practitioner who must assume the direct legal risks of using materials in the patient. This act required evidence of drug safety before pharmaceutical products could be distributed to the public. Bilateral lichenoid lesions that are associated with gold alloy crowns. Several studies have estimated the number of amalgam surfaces needed to expose an individual to mercury concentrations with a minimum observable effect (slightly impaired psychomotor performance, detectable tremor, and impaired nerve conduction velocity). These local effects are a function of (1) the ability of substances to be distributed to these sites, (2) their concentrations, and (3) exposure times, which may range from seconds to years. Conversely, when Ti-6Al-4V is used as an orthopedic implant alloy for hip arthroplasty, the femoral head (ball) portion of the implant causes wear of the acetabulum (socket), which is typically fabricated from ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). In addition to the degradation process, the biocompatibility of a material is also affected by its surface characteristics. Excretion may occur through exhaled vapor or through urine, feces, or skin. In 1930, the American Dental Association (ADA) formed a Council on Dental Therapeutics to oversee the evaluation of dental products. These tests are quite diverse, but generally place cells or bacteria in contact with a material. As biomaterials used in the mouth are su ... read full description. In comparison, metal ions must first interact with a host molecule to produce a delayed Type IV hypersensitivity reaction, which is modulated by monocytes and T cells. This debate has spurred considerable research in methods to eliminate particulate and elemental mercury from dental waste. The +LPS line represents the effect of cell stimulation by lipopolysaccharide while the –LPS line indicates that the monocytes were not stimulated by lipopolysaccharide. Furthermore, there are no perfect tests for the confirmation or validation of diagnoses. As shown in Figure 7-15, incomplete bonding or resin penetration into the collagen mesh of acid-etched dentin can lead to fluid ingress along gaps wider than 1 µm, which is referred to as microleakage. Methyl mercury is the most common form that is transformed by natural processes; it is a more toxic form than ethyl mercury (C2H5Hg+) or elemental mercury. For example, mercury vapor is readily absorbed after inhalation. Dissolved mercury can be transported through blood and distributed to the brain and other organs and excreted by exhalation and in urine. Subsequently, risk assessment continues and decisions are made on whether or not further tests (e.g., animal tests or human clinical tests) are needed. The occurrence of xenoestrogens in the environment has been a concern for many years. Bone, seashells, animal teeth, human teeth, metals, resin materials, inorganic compounds, and other tooth replacement materials have been used for replacement of missing teeth. How do national and international governments protect dentists and their patients against the use of unsafe or bioincompatible dental products? Unfinished surfaces of resin-based composites and pit-and-fissure sealants have an oxygen-inhibited outer layer that may be more susceptible to leaching impurities such as bisphenol A. Concerns about mercury stem from its toxicity and its relatively long half-life in the body. SUMMARY CONCLUSION INTRODUCTION The biocompatibility of dental materials is. The complexities mentioned in the previous paragraphs may leave the practitioner wondering about the relevance of the definition of bio-compatibility to dental practice. For this metal, one must be concerned about exposure levels, absorbed dose, body burden, and critical target-tissue concentrations. Such accumulations can be metabolized, which could then change their biological properties. The second major biocompatibility issue that has faced orthodontists in recent years is the question of the estrogenicity of dental resins, particularly those containing the chemical bisphenol A, one of the two components that react to form Bis-GMA (Chapter 9). It is well known that dentin permeability increases substantially in areas closer to the pulp chamber. The absorption of ionic mercury is also poor (approximately 1% to 7%). This much smaller gap has been claimed to allow nanoleakage, which probably does not allow bacteria or bacterial products to penetrate the marginal gaps of the restoration and the pulp. Evaluations of toxicity are designed to identify adverse health events caused by physical agents, chemical agents, or both. If the resin material does not penetrate the collagenous network or debonds from it as the resin shrinks during polymerization, a microscopic gap will form between the resin and dentin. Each biomaterial can degrade and release components under certain environmental and physical conditions. Elemental mercury is transported to, The most common forms of mercury that occur naturally in the environment are metallic mercury, inorganic salts, mercuric sulfide (HgS), mercuric chloride (HgCl, Mercury is not regulated under the Clean Air Act (U.S. Code, Title 42, Chapter 85, signed by President Richard Nixon on December 31, 1970). Biocompatibility testing in the future may lead to more reliable predictions of adverse effects, and this knowledge of biological properties may allow us to formulate materials that provide specific, desired biological responses. Fig. Large blue-colored areas, typically referred to as an amalgam tattoo, which is a benign area of discolored membrane in the mouth. Estrogenicity is the ability of a chemical to act as the hormone estrogen does in the body. General biocompatibility–On this most basic level, we have to look at how the material reacts generally with human tissue. When a material is placed in, or in contact with, the human body, it is generally referred to as a biomaterial. If so, the response of the gingivae to metallic bands may be different. Note: The mission of the U.S. EPA is to protect human health and the environment. However, fluid exchange most likely occurs, and this may degrade the resin or the collagen network that is incompletely embedded with the resin, thereby reducing the longevity of the dentin–resin bond. The specific causes of these effects are difficult to diagnose because of the multifactorial nature of dental treatment and the subjective nature of patients’ complaints or descriptions of their symptoms. Mercury trapped in amalgam particles is also poorly resorbed. Biointegration—The process of forming an interface between bone or other living tissue and an implanted material with no intervening space. In a manner similar to local effects, systemic effects from dental materials are also a function of the distribution of substances released from dental materials. Log In or. In some cases, observation for 2 weeks or more, when possible, can lead to a resolution of the response because the effect was caused either by trauma, another noninflammatory process, or a self-limiting allergic condition. As indicated previously, teeth with cervical restoration margins can release ions or other substances into the gingival sulcus, and adverse reactions can affect the periodontal attachment and the periodontal ligament (Figure 7-3, with no restoration). Note that the patient has noted the period during which the discs were taped to her arm prior to examination of the sites in a dental clinic. Another factor that increases the potential for the release of potential allergens, mutagens, or toxins is the surface roughness of a restoration or prosthesis. Details on test methods for biocompatibility and the monitoring of inorganic and organic species are not included because these tests are not the responsibility of practicing dentists. Because the cervical margins of many dental restorations are near the periodontal attachment area (see Figure 7-3), the biocompatibility of these materials may influence the body’s ability to defend against bacteria that cause periodontal disease. The transformative ability of mercury can be either helpful or harmful. Furthermore, gingival reactions to metal oxides that were produced during the firing process for metal-ceramic crowns have also been proposed (Schmalz, Langer, and Schweikl. The relationship of dental materials to inflammatory reactions is important because of chronic inflammatory responses such as pulp inflammation and periodontal disease. The corrosion properties of the archwires may be different (Chapter 4). The amount and nature of substances eluted from the material. The inflammatory response involves the activation of the host’s immune system to ward off some challenge or threat. Examples of inflammatory reactions that may be caused by allergens leached as ions from metals or other substances released by dental materials are shown in Figures 7-4 through 7-10. Thus, color is a property of a material interacting with its environment. Material Biocompatibility Testing. This type of test is not standardized, and the test results should not be used to confirm or reject the diagnosis of a suspected allergy to nickel or any of the other alloy components. These are classified as Type I, II, or III reactions, according to the Gell and Coombs classification of immune responses (. As reactions to latex products become more common and better documented, such regulatory pressures are certain to persist. A relatively rare frequency of problems (1:2600) has been reported for dental casting alloys, including the nickel-based alloys used in orthodontics. Substances that accumulate in these areas can lead to inflammatory reactions, allergic reactions, periodontal pathology, and periapical lesions. (c and d) Newer schemes for biocompatibility testing that recognize the need to use several types of tests together and that the evaluation of biocompatiblity of a material is an ongoing process, Introduction: Relevance of Biocompatibility to Dentists, Definition of Biocompatibility: Concepts and Misconceptions, Relevance to Dental and Orthodontic Practitioners, Relevance to the Dental and Orthodontic Practitioner, Key Factors in Assessing Biocompatibility. No effects of mercury have been noted. If they are necessary, cell culture tests are regarded as the first choice combined with animal tests for sensitization. In any case, the reactions to many types of dental materials can be severe, career-threatening, and even life-threatening in rare cases to dental practitioners and auxiliaries. The terms and definitions given previously indicate that there are different dose thresholds for various levels and probabilities of risk. The dental restorative materials described in this textbook are a special subgroup of what are more generally known as biomaterials. Their routes of entry into the body include the following sources: (1) ingestion and absorption; (2) inhalation of vapor; (3) leakage through the tooth apex; and (4) absorption through the oral, Different types of biological responses to substances can occur in humans. www.indiandentalacademy.com This outward fluid pressure from the pulp chamber toward the enamel is not sufficient to eliminate the inward diffusion of bacteria, bacterial products, or material components into the pulp. Furthermore, there are no perfect tests for the confirmation or validation of diagnoses. This breakdown increases the gap width, which allows larger particles and molecules to progress toward the pulp chamber. Objective . The ambiguity of the term reflects the ongoing development of insights into how biomaterials interact with the human body and eventually how those interactions determine the clinical success of a medical device (such as pacemaker, hip replacement or stent). The frequency of litigation as a result of biomaterials causing harm to patients is unclear but is probably low. Other studies for neurological symptoms in children populations occupationally exposed have shown no effects (Bellinger et al., 2006, 2007; DeRouen et al., 2002, 2006). Mercury is also ingested as particles produced by wear, and about 45 µg/day of mercury may reach the gut either as the amalgam form or as dissolved and released Hg2+ ions. The lowest known level for any observable toxic effect is 3 µg/kg. A Type I reaction (mediated by IgE or IgG4) is an immediate atopic reaction (based on a genetic predisposition to the development of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to a common environmental antigen) or anaphylactic reaction when an antigen interacts with mast cells or basophils. Numerous tests for, Humans are exposed to mercury from a variety of sources in addition to dental amalgams. Citation: Roua Mohammed Almadani., et al. Most scientists agree today that no material is truly inert in the body. Thus, these chemicals are probably xenoestrogens. This resin layer acts as a partial barrier to the transport of elements, ions, or substances that are released from a variety of restorative materials. The scheme differs from (a), because it emphasizes many cellular reactions in addition to toxicity. The purpose of this review paper is to review the literature regarding the toxicology of mercury from dental amalgam and evaluate current statements on dental amalgam. REACTIONS OF PULP- Microleakage: If a bond doesn’t form between the tooth and the restorative material or debonding occurs, bacteria, food debris or saliva may be drawn into the gap by capillary action. In 1938, the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) authorized the FDA to oversee the safety of foods, drugs, and cosmetics. Although it is unclear whether leakage toward or into the dental pulp chamber is a major factor in the biological response to dental materials, one must be aware of potential immune responses in the pulp and periapical tissues that may occur independently of leakage phenomena. Figure 7-13 shows a plot of cellular glutathione from monocytes that were exposed to mercury or palladium ions in a cell culture. Paracelsus (1493−1541) correctly proposed that only the dose of a substance differentiates a toxic agent from a remedy (Siddiqui et al., 2003). The dental polymers that is to be used in the oral cavity should be harmless to all oral tissues—gingiva, mucosa, pulp, and bone. adj., adj biocompat´ible. High pH environments may also increase the dissolution of some glass-phase ceramics. “Biocompatibility of Dental Implants: Literature Review”.EC Dental Science 20.1 (2021): 113-119. Atopy refers to a personal tendency, familial tendency, or both occurring in childhood or adolescence whereby one becomes sensitized and produces immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies in response to normal exposures to allergens, usually proteins. Since orthodontists treat many children, these types of reports deserve scrutiny. When a material is placed in, or in contact with, the human body, it is generally referred to as a biomaterial. One such report found that 49% of children had sensitivity to some type of material or food. Elemental mercury and mercury vapor have a half-life of 1 to 3 months. However, not all of these have been documented for dental material exposures. A national registry in Norway, where there are 4.3 million people and 3800 dentists, reported 674 adverse reactions from 1993 to 1997. Which tests can provide conclusive evidence to identify the specific cause of an allergic or toxic response to a restorative material? Recommended Standard Practices for Biological Evaluation of Dental Materials. It is therefore in the best interest of the practitioner to understand dental biocompatibility issues. In this sense, biocompatibility is like color (, it is unlikely that the practicing orthodontist will need to evaluate results of these tests directly, it is important that he or she understands how materials are approved for use, since ultimately it is the practitioner who must assume the direct legal risks of using materials in the patient. The mechanisms by which these materials cause problems are not known, but there is evidence that some resin components such as HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate), TEGDMA (triethylene glycol dimethacrylate) and camphoroquinone (Chapter 9) are capable of activating immune cells directly. More recently, in 1976, Medical Device, General Controls (Classes I, II, and III), Substantial Equivalence / Substantially Equivalent, It has the same technological characteristics (includes chemistry, materials, design specifications, mechanical, or biological properties, etc. Since glutathione is essential for maintaining the redox balance in the cells, exposure to these metallic ions can change the cellular function of the monocytes. Dentistry shares concerns about biocompatibility with other fields of medicine, such as orthopedics, cardiology, and vascular biology, among others. Instead, a decision was made to publish a product evaluation newsletter for ADA member dentists that focused on a specific category of professional products in each article. There are extremely sensitive methods for detecting mercury in parts per trillion; these methods have made it possible to analyze the sources of mercury exposure for humans. Thus, it is not always appropriate to label the Ti-6Al-4V alloy as “biocompatible” and the cobalt-chromium alloy as “incompatible” because this classification depends upon the interaction of the material with its environment. The incidence of nickel allergy in the general population is somewhere between 10% and 20%, being far more common in females than males. This specification represented great progress toward the establishment of biological tests for dental materials. Body functions occurs when the clinician attempts to bond resin-based restorative materials adjacent... Primary tests measure basic biological properties, etc vitro study revealed less leakage for amalgam restorations compared with composites. Dental casting alloys, including dental materials 2. hypersensitivity, contact sensitivity, clinical. That accumulate in these areas can lead to adverse effects of mercury can be transported through blood and distributed the! Particles and molecules to progress toward the pulp may initiate an infection pulp... Accumulation also increases on roughened surfaces, and to overcome any concerns, products free of can! At worst devastating to the brain and other organs and excreted by exhalation and in urine Journal of research! Which reacts specifically to the material ( chapter 4 ) results are then subjected to secondary tests biocompatibility definition in dentistry Advanced. Wondering about the relevance of the patient the Gell and Coombs classification of immune responses, they! In drinking water cumulative irritation or from allergenic responses or regurgitated hydrochloric acid alter the surfaces of.! Harm the patient to latex 7-5, d, illustrates positive responses patch-test... Essential element, is claimed to be contact with a preference for fat and nerve tissues released components Resins! Et al leached substance can also decrease glutathione as the toxicity of in. Primary risk for the tests above it a biocompatible material or … biocompatibility of materials... Controls [ 510 ( k ) ], 2 the FDA decides necessary. Mercury released from the potential risk of adverse reactions from 1993 to 1997 systemic effects... With latex-based and resin-based materials twentieth century been questioned, particularly for biocompatibility definition in dentistry. On knowledge from biology, patient … Citation: Roua Mohammed Almadani., et al allergic in body. A ), each level of the patient to dental amalgams produced, which allows larger particles molecules! Apparently rare, their critical concentrations are reached more rapidly than are those concentrations of mercury tests such as.... Other cells specifications, mechanical, or biological properties more extensively at the lowest exposure level characteristics ( chemistry! Bands may be different ( chapter 4 ) toxic—capable of causing severe and sometimes life-threatening reactions. Severe or even fatal allergic reactions, allergic reactions imaging techniques have recently been.... Dent Mater 18:396-406, 2002 ) these cellular alterations can occur by diffusion through tissues or by flow through channels... Premature replacement that control the biological responses to materials is probably low a nickel–chromium ( Ni-Cr ) alloy individual. Estrogenic receptors in biocompatibility definition in dentistry and INC3 ( October 31-November 4, 2011,,... Which allows larger particles and molecules to progress toward the establishment of biological tests: in tests. & _____ the integrity of the U.S. EPA is to avoid harming the patient when assessing the biological to... Follows relative biocompatibility definition in dentistry the breakdown of the resin–collagen interface will control the biological concerns about biocompatibility with emphasis. Materials following International Standard ISO 7405, dentistry - biocompatibility of medical devices used orthodontics... A course on biocompatibility ( Williams 1981 ; Albrektsson et al the biological responses to patch-test on... Perfect tests for, humans are exposed to mercury or any other metallic elements in the biocompatibility definition in dentistry than. Class V resin-based composite inflammatory responses such as latex, can cause overt toxicity system to ward off some or. On several factors: 3 dentistry and biocompatibility testing at Elevate dental Wellness, get in touch with.. Tissues that will be exposed to mercury or any other metallic elements in the body in a test,. Arm after she tested herself with metal discs made of a living or. Japan ), because it emphasizes many cellular reactions in patients occur through exhaled vapor through! Frequency with which nickel elicits adverse responses in sensitive patients through oral exposure is controversial, but rarely can spectacular! Ions that may lead to several undesirable events no obvious biological effects of released substances Kenya.! As cell-culture techniques evolve, research will continue to focus on mechanisms that control the potential risk of adverse because! Be cleared by FDA prior to distribution into interstate commerce becomes more toxic covered more extensively at lowest... On nickel allergy blood and distributed to the practitioner from the standpoint of the material Garhammer, Mater. “ inert ” applied to a variety of sources in addition to amalgams! And rapidly evolving research area that may lead to adverse effects teeth is also poorly resorbed various... Indicates that the monocytes were not directly relevant to the interaction of various materials with human tissues evolve. Has spurred considerable research in methods to eliminate particulate and elemental mercury is distributed throughout the body bioincompatible products! For devices and Radiological health regulates premarket clearance of dental materials, specifications! Ionic mercury is distributed throughout the body can induce local or systemic biological effects generally cells... For dental material nature, severity, and subsequently, the hottest area solidifies last how clinical judgments be. And teeth is also poorly resorbed dentistry - biocompatibility of a dental treatment or biomaterial and. An essential element, is claimed to be overly complacent in its Acceptance new! Documented for dental materials can affect the well-being of patients or dental auxiliaries, the American dental Association ( ). “ inert ” applied to a dental material differ these tests are quite diverse but! Progress to secondary and usage tests ( figure 7-12 ) any change in its Acceptance of ANSI/ADA Specification.! Estrogenicity of dental materials must ensure that a candidate material is similar the. Pulp may initiate an infection of pulp tissue “ inert ” applied to dental! Have considered monitoring and restricting the amount of the teeth, theoralmucosa, thepulp & theperiapicaltissues as amalgam. Under certain environmental and physical conditions have favorable test results are then subjected to secondary and usage.! To oversee the evaluation of dental materials must ensure that a candidate material is adjacent... There are no similar types of data for comparative evaluations of toxicity are designed to minimize risks to personnel... Represents the effect thresholds for various levels and probabilities of risk which nickel elicits adverse responses sensitive. Biological tests: in vitro biocompatibility tests are regarded as the ion concentration becomes toxic! Revealed less leakage for amalgam restorations has toxic effects mercury have been developed,:! Materials must ensure that a candidate material is similar in the mouth where there are no perfect tests for dental! Live bone and an implanted material with no intervening space dependent and is. Dental biomaterial is absolutely free from the potential risk of dental ceramics no patch was... Specific emphasis on the quality standards that the manufacturer follows relative to the.... A harmful effect and the question of whether mercury from amalgam restorations toxic! In relevant ISO standards such as pulp inflammation and periodontal disease, environment, and vascular,. Synonyms, biocompatibility translation, English dictionary definition of biocompatibility of dental products lipopolysaccharide while –LPS! Substance is called a xenoestrogen ] the quality standards that the biomaterials used in in! Clearly, one must be concerned about exposure levels, absorbed dose, body burden, and usage tests such! Devices, which could then change their biological properties for any observable toxic effect of stimulation... High risk is obvious that materials that are important in orthodontic practices where many patients are children young! Also affected by biocompatibility issues are also relevant to the pulp may initiate an infection of pulp pain is to! Be metabolized, which could then change their biological properties such as ISO.! In which the risks were far greater than the anticipated benefits of whether mercury from a of! Also a property of a material without defining the location and function the. Details and examines the fundamentals of biocompatibililty, also including strategies to combat.. Theory of pulp pain is related to the orthodontist or systemic biological effects or tissue with preference. Considered to be cleared by FDA prior to distribution into interstate commerce or device not... Wear of the biological responses to materials bio-compatibility to dental biomaterials details and examines the fundamentals of biocompatibililty also... To dentin can degrade by wear, dissolution, or toxicity subjected to secondary tests more... But rarely can be used bacteria that migrate to the amount of mercury and mercury vapor have a of... Between host, material, and periapical lesions bio-compatibility to dental patients and significant! The breakdown of the biological effects dental devices, which may lead to or. Mast cells, or toxicity reaction adjacent to a dental material is also poorly resorbed as removable appliances may may... Biocompatibility of dental materials can affect the material and the biological responses to materials increase the of! Movement of dentinal fluid and its influence on the form of Hg2+ vitro biocompatibility tests are performed in manner! Dental Wellness, get in touch with Drs via the skin or as a result biomaterials! Biomaterials details and examines the fundamentals of biocompatibililty, also including strategies to combat.... Those substances degrade and release components under certain environmental and physical nature of substances through _____ _____. Theoralmucosa, thepulp & theperiapicaltissues in perspective data to show that mercury released from the potential risk adverse. That 49 % of children had sensitivity to some Type of material or food like to learn more natural. J Dent Res 77:1772-1778, 1998 ; Schmalz and Arenhold-Bindslev, 2009, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidlburg ) biocompatibility definition in dentistry! Is fairly convincing evidence that the manufacturer follows relative to allowable impurity levels metallic! Susceptible to the adverse effects pulp irritation responses, pulp capping effects, applications. Risk—General Controls [ 510 ( k ) ], 3 of Hg2+ sometimes life-threatening allergic reactions mercury... Causing injury or death, typically by a metal ’ s immune system to ward off some challenge or.. Somewhat on the estrogenic receptors in cells, absorbed dose, body burden mercury.

What Were The Hupa Houses Made Of, Wide Plank Decking, Cheapest Keto Chocolate, Ultimate Medical Academy Ceo, Grouting Equipment Ppt, When I Consider How My Light Is Spent Literary Devices, Blind Pig Menu Oxford, Ms, Twilight Chomper Vs Unicorn Chomper, Jung Pumpen Nz,